Enron Mail

From:k..allen@enron.com
To:m..tholt@enron.com, mike.grigsby@enron.com
Subject:FW: Complaint Against El Paso
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 18 Jul 2001 06:41:13 -0700 (PDT)



-----Original Message-----
From: =09Nicolay, Christi =20
Sent:=09Wednesday, July 18, 2001 6:25 AM
To:=09Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Pharms, Melinda; Novosel, Sarah=
; Steffes, James; Allen, Phillip K.
Subject:=09Complaint Against El Paso

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2001=
08:24 AM ---------------------------


"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org <mailto:JGallagher@epsa.org<< on 07=
/17/2001 10:57:30 AM
To:=09<jdayka@alleghenyenergy.com <mailto:jdayka@alleghenyenergy.com<<, <pm=
ills@alleghenyenergy.com <mailto:pmills@alleghenyenergy.com<<, <tadlhoc@all=
eghenyenergy.com <mailto:tadlhoc@alleghenyenergy.com<<, <John.A.Cohen@BAKER=
NET.com <mailto:John.A.Cohen@BAKERNET.com<<, <Jonathan.W.Gottlieb@BAKERNET.=
com <mailto:Jonathan.W.Gottlieb@BAKERNET.com<<, <zaiontj@bp.com <mailto:zai=
ontj@bp.com<<, <craigc@calpine.com <mailto:craigc@calpine.com<<, <mgerlich@=
calpine.com <mailto:mgerlich@calpine.com<<, <mhickey@calpine.com <mailto:mh=
ickey@calpine.com<<, <smartin@calpine.com <mailto:smartin@calpine.com<<, <r=
onkiecana@cogentrix.com <mailto:ronkiecana@cogentrix.com<<, <agold@coral-en=
ergy.com <mailto:agold@coral-energy.com<<, <Bruce_McKay@dom.com <mailto:Bru=
ce_McKay@dom.com<<, <FallonR@dsmo.com <mailto:FallonR@dsmo.com<<, <lebarret=
t@duke-energy.com <mailto:lebarrett@duke-energy.com<<, <rasiegel@duke-energ=
y.com <mailto:rasiegel@duke-energy.com<<, <sslavigne@duke-energy.com <mailt=
o:sslavigne@duke-energy.com<<, <sarah.tomalty@dynegy.com <mailto:sarah.toma=
lty@dynegy.com<<, <steve.huntoon@dynegy.com <mailto:steve.huntoon@dynegy.co=
m<<, <gmathews@edisonmission.com <mailto:gmathews@edisonmission.com<<, <sus=
an.ginsberg@elpaso.com <mailto:susan.ginsberg@elpaso.com<<, <Christi.L.Nico=
lay@enron.com <mailto:Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com<<, <donna.fulton@enron.co=
m <mailto:donna.fulton@enron.com<<, <rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com <mailto:r=
ebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com<<, <jphill8@entergy.com <mailto:jphill8@entergy=
.com<<, <jabbott@entrix.com <mailto:jabbott@entrix.com<<, "Erin Perrigo" <E=
Perrigo@epsa.org <mailto:EPerrigo@epsa.org<<, "Illane lewis" <ILewis@epsa.o=
rg <mailto:ILewis@epsa.org<<, "Jack Cashin" <JCashin@epsa.org <mailto:JCash=
in@epsa.org<<, "Jodi Empol" <jempol@epsa.org <mailto:jempol@epsa.org<<, "Ja=
ckie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org <mailto:JGallagher@epsa.org<<, "Julie =
Simon" <JSIMON@epsa.org <mailto:JSIMON@epsa.org<<, "Mark Bennett" <MBennett=
@epsa.org <mailto:MBennett@epsa.org<<, "Michael Reddy" <Mreddy@epsa.org <ma=
ilto:Mreddy@epsa.org<<, <steven@iepa.com <mailto:steven@iepa.com<<, <gsmith=
@jhenergy.com <mailto:gsmith@jhenergy.com<<, <lorraine.cross@mirant.com <ma=
ilto:lorraine.cross@mirant.com<<, <mark.temple@mirant.com <mailto:mark.temp=
le@mirant.com<<, <Jack.Hawks@neg.pge.com <mailto:Jack.Hawks@neg.pge.com<<, =
<Marsha.Palazzi@neg.pge.com <mailto:Marsha.Palazzi@neg.pge.com<<, <psierer@=
pwrteam.com <mailto:psierer@pwrteam.com<<, <awarnock@reliant.com <mailto:aw=
arnock@reliant.com<<, <ghinners@reliantenergy.com <mailto:ghinners@reliante=
nergy.com<<, <john_r_orr@reliantenergy.com <mailto:john_r_orr@reliantenergy=
.com<<, <dacrabtree@tecoenergy.com <mailto:dacrabtree@tecoenergy.com<<, <af=
ontana@tenaska.com <mailto:afontana@tenaska.com<<, <jmartin@tenaska.com <ma=
ilto:jmartin@tenaska.com<<, <pete.frost@usa.conoco.com <mailto:pete.frost@u=
sa.conoco.com<<, <lhamilto@utilicorp.com <mailto:lhamilto@utilicorp.com<<, =
<awenner@velaw.com <mailto:awenner@velaw.com<<, <judy.neason@williams.com <=
mailto:judy.neason@williams.com<<
cc:=09=20

Subject:=09Complaint Against El Paso


On Friday, July 13th, a shipper group filed a complaint against El Paso Nat=
ural Gas alleging that the pipeline has oversold capacity into California d=
ue in part to unlimited growth of demands by full requirements customers. =
The complainants request:

(1) that all full requirements customers be converted to contract demand cu=
stomers at reasonable levels;

(2) a mandatory expansion of the pipeline system to be used to meet El Paso=
's existing firm transportation obligations; and

(3) that FERC prohibit El Paso from collecting demand charges for firm serv=
ice it is unable to provide until such time as El Paso can show that it is =
capable of meeting its firm service obligations.

A Technical Conference in El Paso's Order No. 637 proceeding (RP00-336) is =
scheduled for Wed., July 18, 2001 to discuss El Paso's systemwide capacity =
allocation issues, which will include topics addressed in the complaint.=20