Enron Mail

From:eric.bass@enron.com
To:heidi.withers@enron.com
Subject:Re: Additional Transport Expense on Entex meters
Cc:david.baumbach@enron.com, bryan.hull@enron.com, michael.walters@enron.com
Bcc:david.baumbach@enron.com, bryan.hull@enron.com, michael.walters@enron.com
Date:Tue, 14 Mar 2000 05:03:00 -0800 (PST)

I don't know about meter 4486, but the other three are good. In addition,
meter 5792 is another meter that is serviced in the Lufkin-Diboll area.



Enron North America Corp.

From: Heidi Withers 03/14/2000 10:14 AM


To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Additional Transport Expense on Entex meters

Eric, I am checking the process now for incorporating all transport revenue
due Ed for delivery meters in the Texas region. The following meters have
transport rates attached to them which are above and beyond the matrix rates
Ed quotes to Tom. I believe that we are already capturing all Ed's
revenue/Tom's expense for this gas at these meters, but want to be sure of
that. Would you let me know if these are the meters for which we are
manually moving around money from Tom to Ed for the residential portion of
the Lufkin-Diboll volume?



I believe that the industrial portion of this volume is included already as
part of Ducote's deal, and I believe that the residential portion is volume
which you determine and then move from Tom to Ed every month.

Is this right?


Heidi