|
|
Enron Mail |
As a follow up to my email from last Friday (attached below), here is a det=
ail breakout of "Non-Elective Maintenance" by each system. I look forwar= d discussing this with you.=20 =20 Regards, Inja Chun -----Original Message----- From: =09Chun, Inja =20 Sent:=09Friday, November 02, 2001 5:18 PM To:=09Pearce, Barry Cc:=09Pickering, Mark; Beck, Sally; Piper, Greg; Fallon, Jim Subject:=09Non-Elective IT Support Staffing for EBS - 2002 Sensitivity:=09Confidential Following this week's discussions, we have recalculated the absolute minimu= m number of people required to keep your present systems in production. In= recalculating this number, we have eliminated everything except that which= is required for "non-elective" maintenance. Although many of the systems = have been in operation for some time, we still frequently encounter problem= s which interrupt production. Such events require emergency attention and = are what we refer to as "non-elective" maintenance. Therefore, in recalcul= ating these support staff, we have excluded any effort for improvements or = other changes that the users have previously identified for next year's wor= k. Also, we are suggesting excluding any further effort on the Saber Settl= ement, GeoQual, Market Intelligence, DPC Tax & Media Services systems which= we will simply wrap up as those are and put them in "moth balls" for possi= ble future use. As the result of this process, we have come to a core mini= mum number of 19 people required to simply ensure that the remaining system= s continue to function. The only way that we can logically reduce this cor= e number any further would be to "turn off" other production systems. Alth= ough we recognize that the concept of turning-off other production systems = is unattractive, it would be far better to have this happen in a planned, o= rderly fashion than having them crash in an unrecoverable condition later. = =20 Regards, Inja Chun -----Original Message----- From: =09Chun, Inja =20 Sent:=09Friday, November 02, 2001 10:55 AM To:=09Pearce, Barry; Pickering, Mark; Beck, Sally; Piper, Greg Subject:=09ENW/EBS - IT Support for 2002 Importance:=09High Sensitivity:=09Confidential As we discussed at the Lunch meeting yesterday, we have previously reviewed= all of the EBS systems to determine the minimum staffing required to keep = the system operational (maintenance) and to meet any currently identified m= odifications (future development). The summarized numbers are shown on the= attached cover sheet by each system with accompanying backup details. The= details cover major functionalities of systems, magnitude of system (i.e. = # of deals, # facilities) and other information that Greg Piper asked in th= e meeting. Also shown on the last column is an estimate of the impact on o= ur users and customers, if the computer systems were no longer available. = I look forward to discussing these issues with you on Monday, and please l= et me know if you have any questions in the meantime. =20 =09 << File: EBS-IT 2002 Staffing Estimate.xls <<=20 << File: EBS Systems Diagram.vsd <<=20 Regards, Inja Chun
|