|
|
Enron Mail |
Shona,
Thanks for your task force summary. Below is what I have already produced here from the London perspective. Should we not be looking to get more detail of exactly the reasons were especially for human errors and highlight those areas where the problems arise rather than grouping things together and in so doing losing the detail ? Also we should try to get some trend information so that it is clear where we are improving (or not as the case may be) on both a general and specific book basis. James ---------------------- Forwarded by James New/LON/ECT on 10/11/2000 12:43 --------------------------- James New 09/11/2000 16:25 To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Report on London Middle Office RiskTrac Performance Debbie, Using the data you kindly sent me I had one of my guys extract the performance issues from a London stand point and specifically look into the incidence of human errors as those we can 'influence' immediately. I am glad to say that the human error rate is very low and over this (approximate) 30 business day period and in fact there were only 5 human errors on around 120 officialised DPRs. London IT are also going to analyse the data to try to pinpoint trends in their area. Please let me know if this is informative. Regards James
|