|
|
Enron Mail |
We have pursued implementing Unify in London, however there are a number of
issues preventing that from happening in the near future: The Unify IT team has a lot of competing priorities (including the Houston SAP implementation, as well as Houston and Calgary changes and enahncements), and are unable to commit to a firm implementation date at this time. New commitments by ENA (see mail at bottom) have further complicated the priorities, so even the tentative plans for implementing Unify in London this year are in doubt. On the IT side, there are a number of issues with support and scalability of the current architecture of the system. As it doesn't look like Unify can be implemented in London this year, we will therefore change focus to streamlining the existing tactical solutions in London (enhancing Back Office Settlements System, integrating with Global CounterParties, removing London Office Manager, and using SAP where appropriate). Once Unify has been integrated with SAP in Houston we will in a better position to consider the long-term strategic approach to Unify in London. If anyone believes that we should take a different response, please respond to this email. Eric, Ian & Richard Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. From: Fernley Dyson 17/11/99 12:49 To: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Virro/LON/ECT@ECT, David J Williams/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth S Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Unify We need to discuss the details, but to my mind the question has to be why wouldn't we do it? Richard Sage 17/11/99 09:02 To: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Eric Virro/LON/ECT@ECT, David J Williams/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth S Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Unify Putting Unify in London is not something that is going to happen tomorrow. If we are going to do it we need to do it right. Shall we go ahead with this? ______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ Enron Information Technology From: Inja Chun 17/01/2000 01:52 To: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Phil Yoxall/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul F Poellinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Eric Virro/LON/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regan M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Beth Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Revised Unify Plan During the last few weeks, we experienced significant increases in Unify transaction volumes because of Columbia Energy Services acquisition, EOL and Calgary implementation. For example, recently the Logistics transactions increased by 91% while deal/meter count increased by 61% and total volume (MMBTU) by 66%. In addition, it is very possible that volumes may increase by another 30% due to new acquisitions in the near future. For these reasons, we must put our efforts in overhauling Unify Settlement now before working on London implementation. Therefore, we are postponing our February out visit to London., We will let you know our revised plans and targets as soon as we can. Thank you. ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________
|