Enron Mail

From:britt.davis@enron.com
To:rick.kile@enron.com, kenneth.cessac@enron.com
Subject:Northern v. ONEOK/ RE: Bushton ESD
Cc:david.gaines@enron.com, mike.peschka@enron.com, casey.winter@enron.com,dari.dornan@enron.com, drew.fossum@enron.com, j..porter@enron.com, kathy.ringblom@enron.com, becky.zikes@enron.com, don.hawkins@enron.com, phil.lowry@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.co
Bcc:david.gaines@enron.com, mike.peschka@enron.com, casey.winter@enron.com,dari.dornan@enron.com, drew.fossum@enron.com, j..porter@enron.com, kathy.ringblom@enron.com, becky.zikes@enron.com, don.hawkins@enron.com, phil.lowry@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.co
Date:Tue, 2 Oct 2001 07:56:19 -0700 (PDT)

Rick,

Thanks. I understand that the ESD is an annual simulated emergency d=
epressurization of the ETS compressor station on the lean and rich lines up=
stream of the Bushton Plant. By operating the ESD valve, all the gas pipin=
g in the plant yard can be blown to atmosphere by Northern. If that is don=
e, the Bushton Plant obviously goes down and loses the ability to service i=
ts customers for a period of time. =20

You advised that in ESD simulations conducted in years past, we did n=
ot require the compressor to be fully blow down; we performed it in such a =
way that no depressurization at all was required, so the Bushton Plant was =
not out of service at all during the ESD simulations. This year, however, =
someone in Northern's compliance section (maybe Pat Long's group) has requi=
red that the ESD simulation be conducted in such a way that partial depress=
urization of the yard piping will be necessary. Northern has figured out a=
way to do this such that the flow of gas to the Bushton Plant will be unin=
terrupted, with some small pressure changes.

The ESD would normally last 15-30 minutes; however, Northern would als=
o like to take the opportunity to perform needed work on the Northern gener=
ators located
at the ETS compressor station as well. This will extend the simulation per=
iod to about two hours. During this time, Northern's measurement equipment=
(the meters, the chromatograph, and the two Fisher Rocs) will be on batter=
y backup. You mentioned that the big power hog would be the gas chromatogr=
aph.=09

My gut is that we don't want to take any unnecessary chance that our ba=
ck-up batteries would fail and leave us in a position where we had to rely =
on Plant PTR. Accordingly, my suggestions is that we should immediately inv=
estigate renting a Honda generator or some other back-up power source, and =
call Jim Bowen of Instromet for his input. Please remember that although J=
im was our expert in the arbitration, you don't want to just forward our in=
ternal memos and correspondence to him without checking with me first.

I await the input of others.

(Parenthetically, for the time being, I am asking that everyone put "No=
rthern v. ONEOK" in the Subject line of internal e-mails regarding gas meas=
urement at the Bushton Plant, given that we still have a lawsuit pending. =
This applies whether or not the e-mail includes someone in Legal.)=09

Britt


=20
-----Original Message-----
From: =09Kile, Rick =20
Sent:=09Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:07 AM
To:=09Davis, Britt; Cessac, Kenneth
Cc:=09Charlie Thompson/GCO/Enron@ENRON; Gaines, David; Peschka, Mike; Winte=
r, Casey
Subject:=09Bushton ESD

Yesterday I visited with Mike Peschka and Casey Winter at the Bushton compr=
essor station, they mentioned a possible problem next week. On October 11 =
the Bushton Plant will have a planned ESD. A normal ESD would blow all pip=
ing down in the plant yard, so no gas would flow to the Oneok processing p=
lant for a period of time. This year certain blowdown valves will be block=
ed so gas will continue to flow to the Oneok processing plant, this will al=
low the Oneok plant to stay on. Oneok requested that we maintain gas flows=
to their plant, since they have no planned turn around this year. The Bus=
hton measurement equipment will need to be functioning the entire time of t=
he ESD (this includes the chromatograph, Fisher Rocs, and the ultrasonic me=
ters), since gas will be flowing to the Oneok plant and back to us. While =
the ETS compressor station is down, during the ESD, there will be work comp=
leted on the electrical equipment. This work could take up to 5 hours, but=
Casey hopes to complete the work in approximately 2 hours. The back-up ba=
tteries will maintain power, to the measurement equipment, approximately 2 =
hours. The potential problem is that if the work takes more than 2 hours t=
he batteries may fail, and we could lose measurement for a period of time. =
Considering the Oneok measurement situation, we thought it might make sens=
e to notify you of this potential problem. Thanks, please call if you have=
questions.