Enron Mail |
Harry and I agree. The 567,546.5 is the same number we came up with. Thanks. Lynn
-----Original Message----- From: Neubauer, Dave Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:59 AM To: Dornan, Dari; Blair, Lynn; Cessac, Kenneth; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley Subject: RE: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement Charlie, I agree. The settlement is an agreed upon measurement number. Not an agreed upon difference. -----Original Message----- From: Dornan, Dari Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:48 AM To: Blair, Lynn; Cessac, Kenneth; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley Subject: RE: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement Charlie sent me the following message. "If the intent is to calculate the average between the two sets of numbers (NNG's vs ONEOK's) the "settlement number" would be 567,546.5!" As the settlement document states that the blank number is what we are going to use for "PTR", I think Charlie is correct. His number takes the average between the Plant PTR calculation and Northern's number. -----Original Message----- From: Blair, Lynn Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:05 AM To: Dornan, Dari; Cessac, Kenneth; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley Cc: Blair, Lynn Subject: RE: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement Dari, Harry and I have run through the numbers and how we will show the difference on the books and agree with your number. Thanks. Lynn -----Original Message----- From: Dornan, Dari Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:14 AM To: Cessac, Kenneth; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley Subject: RE: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement So the settlement number will be 8,624.50 MMBtu. -----Original Message----- From: Cessac, Kenneth Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:10 AM To: Dornan, Dari; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley Subject: RE: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement Dari, Listed below are the volumes from plant PTR and NNG calculated PTR based on inlet/outlet measurement for September 12 - 17. The Plant PTR values were obtained from a letter from ONEOK to Harry Woodson dated November 1, 2001. This information may help in determining the settlement volume for this time period. Date Plant PTR NNG PTR Difference 9/12/2001 88,335 90,910 2,575 9/13/2001 92,175 95,968 3,793 9/14/2001 93,525 96,151 2,626 9/15/2001 95,422 98,994 3,572 9/16/2001 96,881 98,783 1,902 9/17/2001 92,584 95,365 2,781 TOTAL 17,249 -----Original Message----- From: Dornan, Dari Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:35 PM To: Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Cessac, Kenneth; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley Subject: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement Attached please find a draft settlement agreement for the September 12 - 17 dispute. Please let me have your comments ASAP. We need to fax this on Friday. Dari << File: Oneok Settlement re incident of September 12 - 17.doc <<
|