|
|
Enron Mail |
Phil/John/ Morgan, since Eric has left, can you let us know who to work with on the allocations alternatives??
-----Original Message----- From: Miller, Mary Kay Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:46 AM To: Pribble, Dan; Lowry, Paul; Neubauer, Dave; Porter, J. Gregory; Dornan, Dari; Kirk, Steve; Winckowski, Michele; Loeffler, Michael; Rice, Randy; January, Steve; Blair, Lynn; Darveaux, Mary; Fossum, Drew Cc: Horton, Stanley; McCarty, Danny; Corman, Shelley Subject: Producer meeting The meeting yesterday with about 7 small producers in Okla went fairly well. It is obvious that they now realize that the cost of processing, if necessary is there obligation, not Northerns. We heard the same rhetoric about the history, for the past 30 years it is has been a "wet" system and they entered into contracts without any processing obligations. Northern' can't change due to this and historical operation and "unwaive" the high c6+ based on the highest receipt levels. They (Dan?? ) was very insistent that if a problem occurred, all shippers should be pro rated and NNG's tariff should be enforced at the tailgate of the Bushton plant, not the point of receipt as the tariff currently states. They asked us to file to change, potentially incorporate a default processing agreement that had to be used in the event of high concentrations of C6+-- I think you get the drift of the discussions-- don't just cut my gas, cut everyone To Do's We agreed to look at data from last year (assuming we have it available) to determine what the allocations would have been under the following scenarios: a) Allocation as proposed- highest levels b) Allocation based on prorata at Bushton outlet c) Allocation based on prorata at Demarc Greg is to get in contact with Mitch Hertz (their attorney) to discuss feasibility of requiring gas quality waiver at the tailgate of Bushton: what FERC would do-- what about other shippers-- what is Bushton isn't running what about a default processing agreement being required Hypothetical allocations above, can FERC require Dari, can you find the status and outcome of a Southern docket filed last year? Mary D. validate that we can't require the plant to run-- Mike Loeffler- check Oklahoma state proceeding to find any filing by Energex and Transok relating to gas being "dry" may not yet be filed--- need to watch for it Timing--- we said we would attempt to get back to them mid January-- If you have any questions, please feel free to call myself or Dave N.
|