|
|
Enron Mail |
Cc: terry.kowalke@enron.com, john.buchanan@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: terry.kowalke@enron.com, john.buchanan@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.com X-From: Blair, Lynn </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=LBLAIR< X-To: Hanagriff, Richard </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rhanagr< X-cc: Kowalke, Terry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tkowalk<, Buchanan, John </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jbuchan2<, Blair, Lynn </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lblair< X-bcc: X-Folder: \LBLAIR (Non-Privileged)\Blair, Lynn\Sent Items X-Origin: Blair-L X-FileName: LBLAIR (Non-Privileged).pst Richard, can you check this out for me. Did the team drop the ball on this one? Thanks. Lynn -----Original Message----- From: Brown, Elizabeth Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 10:58 PM To: Watson, Kimberly; Blair, Lynn; Dietz, Rick; Donoho, Lindy Subject: K #27291 - Invoices not capturing incremental fees for alternate points FYI - In working to load rates for the FERC California reporting requirements, it appears that for the last four months Duke Energy T & M contract #27291 has not been billed the incremental fee of $0.06/dth for alternate deliveries to the Cal Border (over and above the base discount negotiated for the contracted primary points). Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Elizabeth x3-6928
|