Enron Mail

From:lynn.blair@enron.com
To:tk.lohman@enron.com
Subject:FW: Revised Sid Letter
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 3 Aug 2001 06:47:58 -0700 (PDT)

TK, I saw this after you left. See what your thoughts are? Thanks. Lynn
-----Original Message-----
From: Corman, Shelley
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 10:34 PM
To: Pavlou, Maria; Harris, Steven; Miller, Mary Kay; Blair, Lynn; 'cmoore@akingump.com'; 'rnuschler@akingump.com'; 'sstojic@gbmdc.com'; Fossum, Drew; Porter, Gregory J.
Subject: RE: Revised Sid Letter


Maria,

I think the revised paragraph focuses on the wrong point. The lack of take-away capacity alone wouldn't make a firm customer prefer a volumetric rate. It's the problem of not knowing from day to day whether such firm transportation will be confirmed at the border (i.e. the windowing procedure).

My feeling is that the desire for a volumetric rate isn't driven by capacity, but by transactional uncertainty.

I would suggest that we use the orginal paragraph -- but drop the discussion of takeaway capacity and focus on the window procedure.


-----Original Message-----
From: Pavlou, Maria
Sent: Thu 8/2/2001 6:38 PM
To: Harris, Steven; Miller, Mary Kay; Corman, Shelley; Blair, Lynn; 'cmoore@akingump.com'; 'rnuschler@akingump.com'; 'sstojic@gbmdc.com'; Fossum, Drew; Porter, Gregory J.
Cc:
Subject: Revised Sid Letter



Pl. comment asap on the revised letter incorporating comments received so far. Joe Koury wants to send to Scott Walker first thing tomorrow a.m. Thanks, Maria

<<1005-001-735.doc<<