Enron Mail

From:lynn.blair@enron.com
To:kent.miller@enron.com, dave.neubauer@enron.com, jo.williams@enron.com
Subject:RE: Morning storage numbers
Cc:steven.january@enron.com, shelley.corman@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.com
Bcc:steven.january@enron.com, shelley.corman@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.com
Date:Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:42:06 -0700 (PDT)

Kent and Dave, I reviewed our analysis of the swing for July 17th this morning in the meeting. High level
recap is:


130,000 Due to building line pack from Monday's gas day
95,000 Day to Day payback and I/C shortages ( the bulk of this was to
repay Norval and Valero Sprayberry about 60,000 from
the previous day)

140,000 Due to Market Area overtake (this includes 40,000 of Mid Am imbalance
plus 100,000 spread over ABC, D and EF. In looking at LSF, we
were not able to determine that any one zone over pulled. It looked
to be pretty evenly distributed)

15,000 Due to 5% tolerance on Power packs.
_______
380,000 The total swing was 419,000. The difference of 39,000 is a combination
operational adjustments.

Hopefully this helps to identify some of your concerns. If you have any questions, please let me
know. Thanks. Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Kent
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 2:56 PM
To: Kowalke, Terry
Cc: Neville, Sue; Williams, Jo; Blair, Lynn; Corman, Shelley; Branney, Theresa; Swett, Larry
Subject: Re: Morning storage numbers

THanks Terry,

We still need to look into what the source of the huge daily unanticipated swing numbers for the past 3 days. Is this related to some of our scheduling difficulties with BP Amoco into El Paso or is it spread across our LDC shippers in the Market Area?

Kent




From: Terry Kowalke/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/19/2001 09:49 AM
To: Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sue Neville/ENRON@enronXgate, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ENRON@enronXgate, Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Theresa Branney/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Swett/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: Morning storage numbers

The storage numbers on the 8 am morning report were the correct numbers but the numbers being referenced to on (Sum Sheet Report) this morning had an error causing the unanticipated swing number be much larger than anticipated. It has been corrected and is now within 2 thousand of the 8 am report. The unanticipated swing number for the two previous days still stands as shown on the sum sheet report. If you have any further questions, feel free to give me a call at, 3-6403. Thank you.

Terry Kowalke