|
|
Enron Mail |
Shelley, I think you want to continue using this report. It is the report we have
used all along to confirm the number against the ultra sonic meters. We can discuss further if you like. Thanks. Lynn -----Original Message----- From: Corman, Shelley Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:39 AM To: Blair, Lynn; Dietz, Rick Subject: FW: PVR 07/16/01 Given the Oneok Arbitration Decision, does it make sense to continue to send this report out? Is it consistent with the decision in that PVR is not used on a going forward basis? -----Original Message----- From: Scurlock, Debra Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 10:09 AM To: 'dkurth@oneok.com'; 'jmosher@oneok.com'; 'jknight@oneok.com' Cc: Woodson, Harry; Blair, Lynn; January, Steven; Spraggins, Gary; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Kile, Rick; Cessac, Kenneth; Buchanan, John; Benningfield, Robert; Berger, Larry; Darveaux, Mary; Mendez, Angela; Kowalke, Terry; Herber, Stephen; McCarran, Penny; Corman, Shelley; Forbish, Sherry; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; Sturr, Kathy; Dykes, Tangie; Janzen, Randy; Scurlock, Debra; Woodson, Harry; Adams, Jean; Greaney, Chris Subject: PVR 07/16/01 The attached is a copy of the spreadsheet reflecting the PVR balance as of 7/16/01. If there are any questions, please contact me at (713) 853-7634. << File: PVR2001.XLS <<
|