|
|
Enron Mail |
Terry, can you send Ranelle July. Ranelle, Terry is working on October
and should have that ready tomorrow. Thanks. Lynn -----Original Message----- From: Paladino, Ranelle Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:58 PM To: Blair, Lynn Subject: RE: Questions on MDQ Lynn, Any luck getting a copy of that July Bushton report for me? It was the one that showed who was scheduled at Bushton with Rate Schedule data so we could see who was flowing interruptible either from a receipt point to the inlet to Bushton or from the outlet to Demarc. Ranelle -----Original Message----- From: Blair, Lynn Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 4:41 PM To: Pritchard, John; Paladino, Ranelle; Winckowski, Michele Cc: Kowalke, Terry; Buchanan, John; Blair, Lynn; Darveaux, Mary Subject: Questions on MDQ Ranelle, John and Michelle, thought I would send this statement to you and see if this helps simplify our answer to your question. The question is: How is MDQ used in the nomination system to ensure we do not double up on MDQ volumes when we have split paths (i.e. nom on same contract from (1) Mid 15 to Bushton Inlet and from (2) Bushton Outlet to Demac) For Nominating purposes: MDQ of contract = Primary Firm + Alternate Firm up to the MDQ. Anything over the MDQ will be Overrun and charged at the IT rate. Point MDQ needs to be considered when allocating a receipt point. EXAMPLE: If the Field MDQ is 10,000, then we will (1) total the reciepts nominated on the contract; (2) compare the total nominated to the Contract MDQ. Then the shipper will get firm (primary and alternate) up to their contract MDQ. Anything over will be overrun at IT rate. If anyone has any other questions, please let me know. Thanks. Lynn
|