|
|
Enron Mail |
Here are my comments on the Draft Permits:
1. EPA did not include the stain tube request for sulfur monitoring. The methods that are currently listed are wet chemistry methods. As we discussed, since the permit allows us to use an APPROVED, alternate method, we will need to submit this request at some time. For the time being, since we want to receive this permit ASAP we should be able to accept the permit as is. 2. It is my understanding that the limits given on CO and NOx are based on ppm @ 15% O2 and not going to the full ISO conversion. We may want to double check that with the agency. Arnold -- Do we have guarantees from GE to back up these limits? 3. The responsible official should be Dan Pribble. Ruth -----Original Message----- From: Campbell, Larry Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:46 AM To: Jensen, Ruth; jfields@argentinc.com Cc: Shafer, John; Kendrick, William; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Martens, Donna; Jerry D. Martin@enron.com Subject: Draft Permits for Stations 3 and 4 The EPA has posted the draft permits for C/S 3 and 4 on their web page for review. To review each permit go to http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/epssdata.htm . Click on the first yellow bullet and drill move down to Arizona, then click the yellow button for US EPA. This will make available the files which are labeled Transwestern Pipeline Company Klagetoh Compressor Station and Transwestern Pipeline Company Luepp Compressor Station. For each file, click on the field labeled "link permit conditions". this will present the draft permit conditions. Due to the urgency of each permits review, Id like comments from Jon and Ruth to me by tomorrow prior to the afternoon phone call I will have with the state of Arizona over the draft conditions for the permits for C/S 1 and 2.
|