|
|
Enron Mail |
Midland Team, the Martin Co. No. 1 facility is potentially in non compliance
because there is new emissions data from the EPA which shows the units at this facility emit emissions which would trigger a Title V air permit. Steve San Miguel and Stoney tried to conduct an emissions test with a portable analyzer but were unable to collect representative emissions data due to the fact that the unit was in very poor mechanical shape and showed very high emissions. We have a couple of options. Spend the $$$$ necessary to bring the unit up to standards that allow a representative emissions test to be conducted and determine whether the emissions from the units trigger permit action or use the new EPA data and submit an air permit application. The choice is yours. Understand, this permit if issued, places some recordkeeping and mechanical responsibilities on the Midland team. Let me know what you would like to do. ---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron on 11/27/2001 08:49 AM --------------------------- From: Gary Maestas/Enron@EnronXgate on 11/26/2001 08:33 PM CST To: Stoney Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: RE: Status of Martin co. NO. 1 Stoney, Let me know what I can do to help. Call me on the cell 713-408-9579 Gary -----Original Message----- From: Buchanan, Stoney Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:36 PM To: Campbell, Larry Cc: Maestas, Gary Subject: Re: Status of Martin co. NO. 1 Larry, you need to direct this to them also, they dont seem to be to worried. I have asked them several times of the status of the work that needed to be performed but have not gotten to far. I think it would benifit us both if you would tag the Director and advisor for them to help me with this. Thanks, Stoney Larry Campbell 11/26/2001 04:34 PM To: Stoney Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Status of Martin co. NO. 1 Stoney, whats going on with Martin1? We are gooing to be in a crack with the state of Texas if we dont have some data which proves we are either greater than 100 tons of emissions on less than the 100 tons. Give me a status Thanks Larry
|