![]() |
Enron Mail |
Sorry I have not responded sooner, but I've been tied up with the crude lines
transaction. The mercury contamination by the old meter shop and hydrocarbon contamiantion at the truck rack are Koch's responsibility. Per EOTT/Koch contract, Koch must be allowed to do the remediation. I sent Koch a letter in December requesting they undertake it. I suggest a call (followed up by a letter) to Frank Van Ryn at Koch to set it up. I'm happy to review or write such a letter. But at this point, you guys should be coordinating with Koch for Koch to remediate. If any other items on your audit need to be addressed (e.g., chromium), please let me know, as I will need to send a demand letter to Koch for them if they are Koch's responsibility. Thanks. --ETA Larry Campbell@ENRON 05/11/01 09:35 AM To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron, Edward Attanasio/Remote/Eott@Eott, Scott Jones/Bakersfield/Eott@Eott cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@Enron Subject: Bakersfield Environmental Action Items Louie/Ed I know you guys are busy, but because of the emphasis Enron places on ensuring that action items from consolidated audits are completed prior to the action item completion date, I really need to know how Scott and I are to proceed on the subsurface drilling activities for potential contamination at the Bakersfield Fractionator. The scheduled completion date for six of the items is 6/30. I understand the there is an issue concerning Koch's individual and shared responsibility for some of the issues identified during the audit. Rich Jolly has contacted me asking me when the drilling will begin, as he does not want to see us exceed the 6/30 date and have the items show up as deliquent in his region. Whatever you can do to assist us in either initiating the investigations or placing a hold on the drilling would be greatly appreciated.
|