|
|
Enron Mail |
Mike, I reveiwed the proposal by Adewumi and it is correct and fairly
accurate, for the purposes of a historic account and and in as far as what was provided to him in the way of data and history. His proposed scope seems to be conclusive and appears to be what we need. I have included Louie in the distribution and am sure he will have some input. My comments are as follows: 1. I dont know how relevant it is to know about the customers facilities at this time. As you know, we have more than one customer (PG&E and SoCal), and I think that we should maintain a low profile especially with respect ot SoCal. Both parties in the past, have been helpful and very cooperative in matters pertaining to PCB's. Because the modeling study will be conducted between C/S 3 and C/S 2, the customers facilities should have no impact on this. 2. Also, I would like to see if we can deal with PCB's and arsenic at the same time? Is it possible to simultanously model both contaminants? 3. Because the modeling efforts are conducted on a very small portion of the pipeline, can this section be used for all of the Transwestern system? In leau of the fact that we have pipe under rivers, over rivers, major elevation chages in short distances etc which are not covered in the section to be modeled, will the pipeline characteristics be covered to the extent that it will yeild information applicable to the entire pipeline system? 4. I am also concerned about stirring up the PCB's and moving additional PCB's into the SoCal system. Its been pretty quiet in discussions with the SoCal PCB person. I wonder if we should notify Ralph Komai to be on the alert when we start the cleaning? Louie, thoughts? 5. Injection of terpenol into the station yard piping. How will we do this and how do we get it out? 6. Impact of terpenol on gaskets, engine parts, etc. "Michael A. Adewumi" <michael@pnge.psu.edu< on 10/29/99 03:15:19 PM To: Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: The Draft of the PCB Cleanup Proposal Dear Mike, David, Larry and Ben: Please find attached the draft of the PCB migration/cleanup proposal as promised. This is only the technical portion of the proposal. Once we agree on the specific scope of the work, the necessary man-hours and the associated budget can then be developed. In addition, we have studied the material given during our meeting and have developed a preliminary list of the data that we would need from you once the project begins. I have decided to attach the list so as to give you adequate time to collect and/or collate this information. Please give me your feedback on the proposal as soon as possible so that we can develop the final version and submit an official proposal. Equally important, the more preparation and planning we do at this stage, the faster the progress that would be made once the project actually begins. Thank you and have a wonderful weekend. Michael A. Adewumi,PhD., Professor of Petroleum & Natural Gas Engineering, Department of Energy & GeoEnvironmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 202 Hosler Bldg., University Park, PA 16802 (814) 863-2816 (814) 863-1875 (FAX) - PROPOSAL_Draft1.doc - required_data.doc
|