|
|
Enron Mail |
Bret: I discussed this with Bill Kendrick this afternoon, our suggestion is
that you forward my original message on the subject to Texaco's attorney asking several questions: 1) is Texaco aware of the pipeline removal activities; 2) has the release been stopped and how; 3) has the extent of impacted soil been determined and does it extend onto NNG's property or down to groundwater; and 4) has the NMOCD been notified. We should also indicate our concern that other Texaco pipelines crossing near or through NNG's facility may also be in poor condition and should be checked, particularly the two lines which cross the southwestern corner of the NNG facility near the location of monitor well MW-3 (NNG's well which contains PSH). This will allow Texaco the opportunity to notify the OCD. In a related matter, I think a copy of the letter that I prepared for Larry regarding excavation activities should be transmitted to Texaco's attorney and the OCD. I suggest sending a copy of this letter to the OCD because Bill Olson with the OCD had asked for a copy of any correspondence that was generated regarding the excavation activities and because Texaco has already indicated that their lab results did not identify the presence of impacted soil remaining in the excavation area. Bret Reich 03/27/2000 10:09 AM To: George Robinson/OTS/Enron@ENRON cc: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: NNG Eunice Station - Recent Development I'm assuming Dynegy took samples and must prepare a report for the New Mexico OCD? Maybe we should give the OCD guy a heads up and let him know we are concerned about impact to our property? I'd like to send those photos to Texaco's attorney and ask for an explanation... what do you think?
|