Enron Mail

From:marc.phillips@enron.com
To:rick.loveless@enron.com
Subject:RE: TNRCC Emission Fees
Cc:kyle.purvis@enron.com, larry.campbell@enron.com, marilyn.june@enron.com,leo.nichols@enron.com, mike.riedel@enron.com, richard.melton@enron.com, ruth.jensen@enron.com, william.kendrick@enron.com
Bcc:kyle.purvis@enron.com, larry.campbell@enron.com, marilyn.june@enron.com,leo.nichols@enron.com, mike.riedel@enron.com, richard.melton@enron.com, ruth.jensen@enron.com, william.kendrick@enron.com
Date:Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:01:00 -0700 (PDT)

The answer to your question is that all emissions reported on the emissions
inventory should be included in the calculation of emissions fees. This leads
to another question-what emissions should be reported on the emissions
inventory?

I discussed this issue with a TNRCC emissions inventory team leader. He
informed me that that is no written guidance on how to report upset,
maintenance, start-up, and shutdown emissions on the emissions inventory, and
as a result be included in emission fees. He did indicate that at previous
emissions inventory workshops, attendees were verbally told to only include
"reportable" (emissions that exceed RQ) on their inventories, and not
"recordable" (non-reportable) emissions. He also mentioned that one ton/year
would also be an acceptable threshold for including emissions in the
inventory.

He is aware that upset, maintenance, start-up, and shutdown emissions are an
important issue, now that they are included in fees. He indicated that TNRCC
will be putting out definitive information on this issue in future emissions
inventory workshops and guidance, in preparation for submittal of calendar
year 2001 inventories that will be due in 2002.


-----Original Message-----
From: Loveless, Rick
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:36 AM
To: Phillips, Marc
Cc: Purvis, Kyle; Campbell, Larry; June, Marilyn; Nichols, Leo; Riedel, Mike;
Melton, Richard ; Jensen, Ruth; Kendrick, William
Subject: Re: TNRCC Emission Fees

Are emission fees paid only on reportable emissions; or are they also payable
on recordable?


From: Marc Phillips/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/21/2001 10:53 AM
To: Kyle Purvis, Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Loveless/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Marilyn June/ECF/Enron@Enron
cc: Leo Nichols/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Riedel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Melton/ENRON@enronXgate, Ruth Jensen/ENRON@enronXgate, William
Kendrick/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: TNRCC Emission Fees

In the last session, legislation was passed in Texas that requires the
payment of emission fees for upset, maintenance, start-up, and shutdown
emissions. Previously these emissions were required to be included in
emission inventories, but not when calculating the fees. Funds generated by
the inclusion of these emissions are to be used by TNRCC for enforcement and
monitoring activities for air quality permitting, air quality assessment and
planning, and enforcement and compliance support.
TNRCC is requiring that the additional fees for upset, maintenance, start-up,
and shutdown emissions be included in the fees that are due this Fall for
calendar year 2000 emissions. Industry groups are questioning the legality of
TNRCC requiring the added fees for 2000 emissions since the effective date of
the legislation was September, 2001. TNRCC is being requested to change this
and legal action is being considered. I will keep you updated as this issue
develops.

Marc N. Phillips
Director, Regulatory Technical Analysis
713-646-7646 (cell 713-594-6919)
marc.phillips@enron.com