Enron Mail

From: owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net To: market_relations@nyiso.com, nyiso_tech_exchange@global2000.net Subject: RE: $20,000 DAM adder Cc: Bcc: Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 02:20:00 -0700 (PDT) barkerde@nmenergy.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: Ray, What if you want your transaction to be cut if the economics support it? You change your DAM ( or leave it at the original bid) to a price sensitive bid and the BME promises you that price you wanted in your bid, then SCD runs and the real time (no constraints thus no BME clearing) runs up due operational restrictions and the price you get clobbers you? Like it did before the $20 K adder. All these problems would go away if the BME clearing at the Proxy busses,passed by BIC and MC ,was implemented. Baby-sitting your DAM bids would solve the " schedule and forget deal" but if you have any arb or price sensitive schedules then you run into the risk above. Given the apparent limitations of the NYISO (software ?) we might have to pick and choose which band aid approach is more palatable.