Re: Issues Pertaining to Meeting with PG&E

I don't know what the cost is, but it may be a good thing if it were flushed.
Mike

Larry Campbell
06/02/99 08:42 AM
To: Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rich
Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Butch
Russell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Earl
Chanley/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@Enron, Rick Cates/ET&S/Enron@Enron
Subject: Issues Pertaining to Meeting with PG&E

I spoke with Tony Estrada yesterday concerning the sampling protocol and he
indicated that the document is almost finished. We then focused our
discussion upon agenda items for the upcoming meeting in Las Vegas on
Monday. One thing we should begin to think about and I'm pretty sure it will
be an agenda topic during the meeting, is the issue of the pipe contamination
between our Measuring station and their compresssor station. Tony's feeling
is that with all the cleaning of equipment and installation of the pigging
facilities, this section of pipe may be a future headache.

It seems that Vector was onsite with the PG&E and they may have pointed out
this point of concern. PG&E might possibly want this this portion of the
system flushed.