Enron Mail

From:larry.campbell@enron.com
To:randy.belyeu@enron.com
Subject:Environmental findings, Koch South Texas Records Review
Cc:william.kendrick@enron.com, joe.richards@enron.com
Bcc:william.kendrick@enron.com, joe.richards@enron.com
Date:Thu, 3 May 2001 09:30:00 -0700 (PDT)

Randy, this is a short summary of the environmental findings that were
identified during the records review conducted at the Corpus Christi Koch
facility offices on May 1st and 2nd of this year.

All environmental records which were available in the file data room at the
Koch office were reviewed. Assumptions were made that the environmental
records were complete for all assets included in the sale. Primary emphasis
was placed on those environmental issues which are normally associated with a
sale or purchase of assets dealing with distribution and transmission of
crude oil. In particular, pipeline and tank farms were the most critical
assets which were reviewed.

Based upon the data review, the Koch assets were in compliance with the
following:

Air permitting, permit by rule, standard expemtions, recordkeeping and fee
payments were documented

NSPS recordkeeping and inspections for VOC control on large crude oil tanks
were documented

Oil Pollution Act-OPA 90 plans had been prepared and were up to date

SARA compliance and reporting had been completed

SPCC plans had been prepared for each site which qualified under 40 CFR 112

Spill reporting history and notifications to the state agency were
available for review

There are ongoing groundwater and soil remediation activities at one site
included in the asset for sale
(permits for the remediation activity is in place)

Hazardous waste notifications, annual reportings and fee payments were
documented

Based upon the above review, there were no issues which could be identified
which would be condsidered a major environmental limitation or would be a
considered a major environmental liability. This statement is again based
upon the assumption that all environmental information was present in the
data room for the assets in question. It should also be stated that this
analysis of Koch's environmental compliance is based upon the fact that Koch
has not held back or provided false or misleading information or knowledge
during their presentation or informaiton contained in the facility files.

Pending further development and interest of this potential purchase, a
recommendation is made to conduct a phase I due diligence and site visit to
each location to verify findings from the records review. Also, due to the
past history of Koch's operating practices, it is recommended that contract
conditions be implicitly stated that EOTT will not be held liable for
discoveries of past deficiencies or releases of contamination which have
occurred on any of the Koch assets purchased.