Enron Mail

From:larry.campbell@enron.com
To:john.shafer@enron.com, louis.soldano@enron.com, cutty.cunningham@enron.com,william.kendrick@enron.com
Subject:Meeting with the Laguna's over the PCB remediation at C/S 6
Cc:rich.jolly@enron.com, rick.smith@enron.com, butch.russell@enron.com,george.robinson@enron.com, team.laguna@enron.com, ted.ryther@enron.com
Bcc:rich.jolly@enron.com, rick.smith@enron.com, butch.russell@enron.com,george.robinson@enron.com, team.laguna@enron.com, ted.ryther@enron.com
Date:Wed, 24 Jan 2001 03:07:00 -0800 (PST)

I wanted to present this summary of the meeting Transwestern had with
representatives of the Laguna Pueblo concerning the status of the PCB
remediation activities by TW. On the Laguna side were members of the Laguna
pueblo, the PEOP a technical oversight group that provides expertise and
assistance on technical issues for all of the 19 pueblos in New Mexico
(ranging from UST to superfund), and members of ETS ( 5 members of the Laguna
team, Butch Russell, Rick Smith (advisor for the Laguna team), myself) and
George Robinson. This is the third meeting we had in the last year and a
half with this group since the Lagunas have started showing renewed interest
in environmental activities on their pueblo.

The meeting centered around two issues at the site: the closure of the UST
and the PCB remediation activity. With respect to the first, concensus was
reached that we would continue monitoring and collecting groundwater samples
at the two downstream well locations from the UST site on a quarterly basis,
and send the results to POEP for review.

With repsect to the PCB remediation issue, things were a little different.
The POEP representatives expressed concern on behalf of the Laguna tribal
Coucil that the progress of the remediation activities Transwestern is
presently using to bring closure to the site is not showing positive goals
toward achieving cleanup at the site and that the data submittals to the
Lagunas have verified this. They indicated that that have been patient with
Transwstern's attempts to allow natural attenuation to reduce the PCB
contamination, but based upon the historic sampling results, that this
technology is not proving to be very successful, in fact the results have
shown stagnant results (Im using their words). They would like to see
Transwestern implement other more proactive technologies to arrive at cleanup
and closure of this site. Members of the Laguna pueblo, who work for the
POEP, expressed concern that the PCB contamination could negatively impact
future generations of Lagunas members and that it was the responsibility of
Transwestern to clean up the contamination which they brought onto their
lands. One member of the Laguna pueblo called the contamination a "cancer"
with potential to spread. A comment was made by the POEP that there was a
major potential of increasing the magnitude and spread of the contamination
if we continue to just maintain our present approach of just monitoring the
site and installing additional wells..

A member of the POEP has been in contact with a consortum of individuals from
North Dakota State University, (Energy and Environmental Research Center) who
claim to be experts in reclamation of contaminated sites which are considered
difficult to remediate (this site would certainly fall into this category due
to the presence of the sandstone bedrock which has numerous cracks and
channels present which direct the PCB containing liquids present at the
site). Although the POEP was not recommending Transwestern utilize their
service, they did strongly suggest that we should at least discuss this site
with them.

It shold also be mentioned that Syed Risvi, the POEP Superfund representative
was at this meeting. He had mentioned that the POEP has been in discussions
with EPA Region VI concerning potential classification of the site on the
CERCLIS list of sites for inclusion on the NPL.. He had indicated that he
did not want to see this site included on the list, but stated that
Transwetern needed to update and show postive results in our remediation
efforts and that it was the tribal councils opinion that this was not being
done.

At the conclusion of the meeting, I informed the POEP that Transwestern's
internal remediation group would contact the NDSU group and discuss the site
characteristics with them and we would reprot back to them the results of our
discussions. This seemed to satisify the POEP and they were content with
this.

John, I would like to schedule a conference call with the above list of
people and discuss this issue. A couple of things I want to bring out.
First, we will be undergoing ROW and Compressor Station renewals with the
Lagunas in the near future. Second, on the Laguna tribal lands, they have
experienced other releases of contimation and are currently very sensitive to
this whole contamination problem. Although we are considered by the POEP as
proactive up to this point and very easy to work with (direct quote from the
POEP) they are wanting a more proactive and measurable effort from
Transwestern to clean up the PCBs.
Please get back with me on this.