|
|
Enron Mail |
Bill, the baseline noise surveys, which have been completed, were performed
by Hoover and Keith out of Houston, Tx. I have a meeting scheduled with the permit engineers from state of Arizona on Monday to discuss the permitting for the two C/S on state lands. Ive dealt with these individuals before, but the ADEQ has gone through some reg changes and I want to visit with them on that. After that meeting, I will decide who should do the applications. I have calls in to the person I deal with in the EPA in San Francisco for the two locations on the Navajo lands. Pending the outcome of each meeting, I will decide who to use. Ive used Argent in the past for both Arizona permits and Indian lands permits, and they would probably be my first choice. I am keeping Mr. Ayers involved in the permitting process and all changes or activities that impact the permits for Arizona. One thing that I shold mention is that I spoke with Phil Lowery about his desires for this project. He has requested that the existing units at each station maintain operations for six months after the turbines have been installed to act as a backup in the event that the turbines temporary fail or to iron out any potential kinks. Based upon the reduction in emissions from the existing mainline units, which will be permitted for a six month period, there will still be an overall major emissions decrease. After the six month period, the existing units will be abandoned in place and not be operated again. Also, my intent is to permit these turbines at 45 ppm NOx as opposed to the lower 25 ppm NOx number to eleminate the problems that were originally encountered on the Northern Border system. If this was a new station, I probably wouldnt be allowed to use the 45 number, but seeing as how there will be a major decrease in emissions from shutting off the recips and using the turbine, this should be easy to do. The differrence in emission between 45 and 25 is not that great and it will allow the facilities in Az a larger range of operation comfort as opposed to the 25 ppm number that Rolls says they can do, but has had trouble reaching. One thing that has complicated the permitting is the elevation and temperature extremes at the locations. By permitting at 45 ppm, this will greatly help this. Ill share the emissions numbers with you, when I receive them from Rolls and the emissions info I have from the existing units. I have spoken to Terry Hacket about doing the F-1 document for the FERC submittal, and have been feeding him data and supporting information for the report. Based upon the scope of work for the turbine installation, the F-1 report will be completed by March 1. Is there something Ive missed? William Kendrick 02/19/2001 04:44 AM To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron cc: john shafer Subject: RE: TW Expansion Project Larry-- Who will be the air permit management team, consultants and internal. Bill Larry Campbell 02/15/2001 09:25 AM To: John Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, Arnold L Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@Enron, David Ayers/GCO/Enron@Enron Subject: RE: TW Expansion Project Thanks John, I was assisted by the reg floks in Omaha and Earl Chanley about who the PM was. In anticipation of the fast track nature of this project (nowadays everything seems to be of this sort) the noise surveys for the FERC application have been completed at each station, the F-1 document for the is in preparation for the turbine installations, and I have a meeting with the state of Arizona on the 26th to go over permitting issues relevant to the air applications for C/S 1 and 2. I have contacted Region IX EPA about discussing the permitting for the two stations on Navajo lands, but have not heard from them. We're on our way........ John Shafer 02/14/2001 07:07 PM To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON Subject: RE: TW Expansion Project This what's happening. John ---------------------- Forwarded by John Shafer/OTS/Enron on 02/14/2001 08:03 PM --------------------------- From: Jerry D Martin/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/14/2001 04:23 PM To: Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON cc: John Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, Randy Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Craig/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Norm Spalding/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John R Keller/OTS/Enron@Enron Subject: RE: TW Expansion Project I just realized that I did not let everyone know who the Project Manager is. Arnold Eisenstein will be the PM. We are working on the kickoff documents, and will have them ready soon to present in a kickoff meeting. You will be advised of this meeting. Thanks, Jerry -----Original Message----- From: Phil Lowry Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 9:06 PM To: Jerry D Martin Cc: John Shafer; Randy Rice; Morris Brassfield; Rich Jolly; Rick Craig; Steven Harris; Ben Asante; Norm Spalding; John R Keller Subject: TW Expansion Project Approval has been given to proceed with preliminary activities to accomplish an expansion on the TW System on a "Fast Track". The option which has been approved is Option #1 (38,000 hp turbine at Stations 1, 2 3 and 4.) At this time you should prepare a Work Order authorization for $350,000 to capture those preliminary cost. I assume that negotiations with a compressor manufacturer will result in a requirement to commit to an order within the next 60 days. Before a final order (with a cancellation schedule) can be executed we will need additional approval authorization. When you have determined the Project Manager for this project please inform all the interested individuals. We look forward to reviewing a project timeline in the very near future.
|