Enron Mail

From:john.shafer@enron.com
To:eric.gadd@enron.com
Subject:Preliminary Environmental Timeline for Sun Devil Project
Cc:kevin.hyatt@enron.com, larry.campbell@enron.com, doug.cebryk@enron.com,robert.kilmer@enron.com, gina.taylor@enron.com, louis.soldano@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com, jschmidt@ensr.com
Bcc:kevin.hyatt@enron.com, larry.campbell@enron.com, doug.cebryk@enron.com,robert.kilmer@enron.com, gina.taylor@enron.com, louis.soldano@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com, jschmidt@ensr.com
Date:Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:07:00 -0700 (PDT)

Eric,
As we discussed, with ENSR's assistance I have developed a projected timeline
for developing the FERC required F-1 Exhibit (12 part Resource Reports to
satisfy the NEPA requirement) in sufficient detail to meet the FERC filing
requirements and expedite the processing of the environmental portion of the
application. The aggressive timeline assumes that the expedited FERC
"Collaborative Approach" will be implemented throughout the processing of the
application. Even with the "Collaborative Approach" and all of the upfront
work done with the environmental community to streamline the processing, the
schedule is very, very optimistic and assumes that all conflicting issues
will be resolved quickly and the processing continue.

I have requested that Jon Schmidt (ENSR) begin working on a detailed cost
estimate, by quarters in two phases. The first part of the estimate would be
to project the environmental cost, by quarters of preparing the 12 Resource
Reports (including the necessary field work) that would get Sun Devil to an
FERC filing in the first quarter of 2002 that would not be rejected. The
second component of the cost estimate would be to complete the field work and
permitting phases during the processing of the application. This includes
participating in FERC scoping meetings and agency meetings as required. This
would include assisting the third party environmental contractor in working
on the EIS to expedite the writing as needed. It would also include
mitigation packages to satisfy agency requirements. The third and final
component would be to budget for a Third Party Environmental Contractor to
write the EIS document during the time that the field work is being developed
and to process the same with the FERC Staff. Once we get the "White Paper"
Fatal Flaw analysis that ENSR is preparing for this project we will have
enough information along with the budget to get us to the FERC filing to make
some quantifiable decisions on moving forward when comparing those to the
commercial advantages that you are developing.

If you have any questions, please give me a call. John Shafer