![]() |
Enron Mail |
I agree with Melissa and am in favor of a separate process.
PT/RH employees need to be rated on a relevant scale. A PT employee's job scope "the place the initial bar is set" is not relevant to a FT employee. Facilitation and Ground rules are great but as we know they change as the circumstances of a meeting change. Consistency here has not been our strength. I also agree that the PT/RH is an important talent pool. If we don't give these folks a chance at equal rating we stand to lose the ability to offer this as a legitimate employee class. In addition, we need to consider the message sent to FT employees. Will they preceive the process as fair. Thanks Cb From: Melissa Becker/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/27/2001 12:04 PM To: Gina Corteselli/ENRON@enronXgate, Gerry Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert W Jones/ENRON@enronXgate, Sarah A Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mary Joyce/ENRON@enronXgate, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Butcher/ENRON@enronXgate, Kriste Sullivan/ENRON@enronXgate, Suzanne Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, Elyse Kalmans/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Cynthia Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Judy Gray/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Moore/ENRON@enronXgate cc: Subject: RE: Part Time/Reduced Hours Employees and PRC In my opinion, a part time person who may add value in the time that they are able to work will invariably get "creamed" in the prc, and that might impact our ability to tap into this talent pool (assuming we want to). I agree that a part time person can't possibly add as much value (in most cases) as a full time person, but it might be terribly demotivating to continually be rated as "bottom of the pack". I advocate either (1) a separate process or (2) feedback without a ranking (like the non-exempts). -----Original Message----- From: Corteselli, Gina Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:03 AM To: Gibson, Gerry; Oxley, David; Lynch, Drew; Jones, Robert W.; Davis, Sarah A.; Olson, Cindy; Cash, Michelle; Barnard, Marla; Joyce, Mary; Yowman, Andrea; Butcher, Sharon; Sullivan, Kriste; Brown, Suzanne; Kalmans, Elyse; Tilney, Elizabeth; Barrow, Cynthia; Smith, Gary; Pieper, Kalen; Becker, Melissa; Gray, Judy; Moore, Karen Subject: Part Time/Reduced Hours Employees and PRC All, As you know I have been tasked with soliciting your views and suggestions on PT/RH employees and PRC. From my personal point of view I don't think we should have a separate process for PT/RH employees. I think that we should cover the issue in facilitator training and have a statement in the ground rules defining who is rated in PRC meetings, i.e. "all active exempt employees hired after January 1, 2001 who have full time, part time or reduced hours are rated in PRC." Likewise, the new feature to provide employee accomplishments in the PRC meeting may help to balance the committee's perspective on PT/RH employees. Your thoughts? Gina
|