![]() |
Enron Mail |
Dear David:
Thanks so much for your voicemail message confirming your agreement and ass= urance that the Enron HR Global team will ensure compliance with the strate= gy approved by the Enron Corp. Board of Directors relating to the use of se= parate lines of business to manage Enron's risks, liabilities and costs. As you know Enron maintains many separate lines of business with separate a= ssets, directors, officers, employees and payrolls. This provides a protec= tive shield described or known as the "corporate veil". Thus, in the event= of litigation, only the assets of the individual business are subject to s= aid litigation, its attendant risks, liabilities and costs if Enron adheres= to basic corporate principles and the separate line of business is truly a= separate entity. If the corporate veil is pierced and other Enron entitie= s, including Enron Corp. are successfully subjected to the risks, liabiliti= es and costs of said litigation, then all of the assets of Enron would be a= t risk. Further, litigation, risk management, accounting and finance, tax= , treasury, and many other Enron Corp. groups work diligently to ensure com= pliance with this strategy. All filings with the federal government, inclu= ding the 10K and Proxy Statements, reflect this strategy. In addition, ther= e are certain Enron benefits, namely the Enron Corp. 1994 Deferral Plan, wh= ich require all participants in said plan be an employee of Enron Corp. One of the additional ways Enron minimizes said risks is to ensure that emp= loyees are employed and paid by the proper employer. Thus, Enron has many = payrolls and Enron Corp. is not a master payroll company. As you know, the= pipelines are regulated by the FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission)= and separate payrolls are necessary for each pipeline. Further, Enron has= separate payrolls for it union companies, its third country nationals and = its expatriates. These payrolls are in addition to the local payrolls of = Enron in those countries in which we do business around the world. Thus, it is imperative that each of the Enron entities properly reflect the= ir respective directors, officers, and employees. Here in the United State= s, each of our separate lines of business have separate Federal Employer Id= entification Numbers. During times of Enron reorganization and movement of= Enron employees from one Enron entity to another, if this movement results= in a change in the employee's employer, under the U.S. Tax laws, FICA With= holding for both the new Enron employer and employee begin again. The empl= oyee may file a new W-4 form to alleviate some of the tax consequences or t= he employee can wait until he/she files the income tax return for the year = in question and receive a refund. The Enron employer does not receive a re= fund or any credit when it must pay the employer's portion of FICA even tho= ugh it has been paid in whole or in part by another Enron employer. This p= ayment by the Enron employer is a small amount to pay in comparison to the = overall risks. As we discussed, any changes with respect to this strategy, including the i= mpact on payroll, Enron employers, and Enron employees must be reviewed and= approved by the Enron Corp. Board of Directors due to the significant risk= s to Enron Corp., its subsidiaries, divisions, and affiliates. =20 I appreciate your enthusiasm for compliance with this important strategy an= d respectfully request your immediate assistance in communicating this stra= tegy to your team and assuring that they in turn make sure that all of the = Enron employees who are not currently employed by the proper Enron employer= are transferred as soon as humanly possible in order to minimize the risks= . I understand that failure to place the employee in the proper company ha= s an impact in many areas around Enron, including PRC, compensation, ibuyit= , ipayit, and benefits, just to name a few.=20 If you have any questions, please contact me at 713-853-7224. Thanks so much for your help. Sharon =20
|