FW: need advice on managed out folks

Michelle, I need your help on this issue as we are in the meeting phase an=
d=20
are getting questions=01(
As far as managed out employees, we=01,d like to include them in the system=
in=20
some fashion. If we make them =01&active=018 in addition to the legal impl=
ications=20
that may exist, we will skew our demographics. Do you have any issue with=
=20
our making/calling these managed employees terminated emp. 1, 2, 3 etc, if=
=20
that is possible in the system and keeping them separate from the =20
demographic numbers which Andrea is working with? =20

Thanks Gina
-----Original Message-----
From: Corteselli, Gina =20
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 11:57 AM
To: Cash, Michelle
Cc: Oxley, David; Inglis, Elspeth
Subject: need advice on managed out folks
Importance: High

Michelle; =20
As regards managed out employees, I believe the plan is to still include th=
em=20
in BU distribution. The method of including them may give you some=20
heartburn. In essence, in order to graph during the meeting to show=20
distribution with the managed out people, we would either have to enter=20
dummy data into PEP (which corrupts our data and could mess up datamart whi=
ch=20
we feed into), or we have to add them into PEP as active employees (PEP can=
=01,t=20
pull inactive employees), or as business associates.
What is your take on this?=20

On another less troublesome issue, we will have the diversity system up and=
=20
running on Tuesday. We can=01,t migrate the program into stage, because we=
=01,re=20
using that environment for PC driver training. (more than you wanted to=20
know?)
If ok w/ you we can discuss diversity stats on Tuesday.