Enron Mail

From:cynthia.barrow@enron.com
To:gina.corteselli@enron.com, gerry.gibson@enron.com, david.oxley@enron.com,drew.lynch@enron.com, robert.jones@enron.com, sarah.davis@enron.com, cindy.olson@enron.com, michelle.cash@enron.com, marla.barnard@enron.com, mary.joyce@enron.com, andrea.yowma
Subject:RE: Part Time/Reduced Hours Employees and PRC
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 27 Apr 2001 05:20:00 -0700 (PDT)

I agree with Melissa and am in favor of a separate process.

PT/RH employees need to be rated on a relevant scale. A PT employee's job
scope "the place the initial bar is set" is not relevant to a FT employee.

Facilitation and Ground rules are great but as we know they change as the
circumstances of a meeting change. Consistency here has not been our
strength.

I also agree that the PT/RH is an important talent pool. If we don't give
these folks a chance at equal rating we stand to lose the ability to offer
this as a legitimate employee class.

In addition, we need to consider the message sent to FT employees. Will they
preceive the process as fair.

Thanks
Cb





From: Melissa Becker/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/27/2001 12:04 PM
To: Gina Corteselli/ENRON@enronXgate, Gerry Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert W
Jones/ENRON@enronXgate, Sarah A Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marla Barnard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mary Joyce/ENRON@enronXgate, Andrea
Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Butcher/ENRON@enronXgate, Kriste
Sullivan/ENRON@enronXgate, Suzanne Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, Elyse
Kalmans/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Cynthia
Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kalen
Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Judy Gray/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Moore/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: Part Time/Reduced Hours Employees and PRC

In my opinion, a part time person who may add value in the time that they are
able to work will invariably get "creamed" in the prc, and that might impact
our ability to tap into this talent pool (assuming we want to). I agree that
a part time person can't possibly add as much value (in most cases) as a full
time person, but it might be terribly demotivating to continually be rated as
"bottom of the pack". I advocate either (1) a separate process or (2)
feedback without a ranking (like the non-exempts).

-----Original Message-----
From: Corteselli, Gina
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:03 AM
To: Gibson, Gerry; Oxley, David; Lynch, Drew; Jones, Robert W.; Davis, Sarah
A.; Olson, Cindy; Cash, Michelle; Barnard, Marla; Joyce, Mary; Yowman,
Andrea; Butcher, Sharon; Sullivan, Kriste; Brown, Suzanne; Kalmans, Elyse;
Tilney, Elizabeth; Barrow, Cynthia; Smith, Gary; Pieper, Kalen; Becker,
Melissa; Gray, Judy; Moore, Karen
Subject: Part Time/Reduced Hours Employees and PRC


All,

As you know I have been tasked with soliciting your views and suggestions on
PT/RH employees and PRC. From my personal point of view I don't think we
should have a separate process for PT/RH employees. I think that we should
cover the issue in facilitator training and have a statement in the ground
rules defining who is rated in PRC meetings, i.e. "all active exempt
employees hired after January 1, 2001 who have full time, part time or
reduced hours are rated in PRC." Likewise, the new feature to provide
employee accomplishments in the PRC meeting may help to balance the
committee's perspective on PT/RH employees. Your thoughts?

Gina