![]() |
Enron Mail |
Cindy,
FYI regarding the labor/employment lawyer for EBS -- according to Sharon, she was asked to be point person for EBS. I'll let you know when I talk with Mark, which should be early next week upon his return from London. Have a great weekend! Is Chelsea giving you a mother's day gift? Michelle ----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 09:17 AM ----- Sharon Butcher@ENRON 05/11/2000 07:33 PM To: Kriste Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Courtney Rath/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Employment Agreement Dear Kriste: I agree we need point persons. I think you might have reversed the groups as Rex Rogers and Kristina Mordaunt asked me to be the point person for EBS. I have been the point person for Corp. and Azurix. It is my understanding that you are the point person for EES and Wind Corp. I don't know the status with respect to GPG, EE&CC, APACHI, CALME, South America, and India. During the past year, upon request, I have worked on employment agreements for all of these entities. Thanks. Sharon Kriste Sullivan 05/11/2000 06:01 PM To: Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Courtney Rath/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Employment Agreement Although we did not discuss it today in our meeting, I believe that Mary's group was looking for a point person for each operating company for the purpose of division of labor of the preparation of the executive employment agreements, I recommended to Courtney today that you be the point person for Corp., Azurix, GPG and EE&CC. I would like to be the point person for EES, EBS and Wind. Of course, as usual, we will continue to cover for each other and work on what ever agreements come our way in order to get the agreements done. I am sure that there are other operating companies that we should divide up but the big ones are noted above. What do you think?
|