|
|
Enron Mail |
We will need to look at our vacation pay practice with Weil to determine whether we can pay out in the future for accrued, but unused vacation.
I think we can say that they'll get no less than $4500, but we want to confirm with Weil. Don't know about parking/bus. I think it is regular course, but we may have to change that regular course. -----Original Message----- From: Pieper, Kalen Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:09 AM To: Cash, Michelle; Sullivan, Kriste; Oxley, David Cc: O'rourke, Tim Subject: FW: Retained Q&A key questions that would be great to answer for current employees before Friday: -Vacation policy, we should be able to answer this one ourselves. do we really need Weil's input? -Severance, obviously part of the retention request to the courts, but can we say that they will get no less than $4500? -Parking subsidy/bus subsidy-i'm tracking this with Steve Kean -business expenses paid pre-petition, part of the clarification to courts. just so you know, George Wasaff is not processing any expenses pre-filing across the board. I would love to be able to answer vacation, i think we should draft the following: -Carry over is 1 week, with exceptions approved by manager (Michelle, David is concerned to put out a blanket 2 week carry over as there are only pockets of people working all hours to year end) -We will pro-rate starting Jan 1 2002. So when people are termed, they will receive prorated vacation, not full as in past, plus any carry over. Why can't we get this one out? -----Original Message----- From: James, Terrie Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:44 PM To: Reagor, Rodney Cc: Cash, Michelle; O'rourke, Tim; Pieper, Kalen Subject: Retained Q&A Here it is for posting. I'll craft an email to send to employees with a link to the intranet: << File: Retained Q&A - 12.11.01.doc <<
|