![]() |
Enron Mail |
-----Original Message----- From: Malowney, John Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 3:20 PM To: Scholtes, Diana Subject: FW: Vanalco Transmission Diana; not only am I interested in your interest, but I'd like to visit with you about this as a learning tool. Let me know when you'd like to discuss it. Thanks, John -----Original Message----- From: Bob Griffin [mailto:rdg@keywaycorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:54 AM To: Malowney, John Subject: Vanalco Transmission Hi John - As we discussed earlier, this is the information about the contract Vanalco is attempting to resell. The Contract Demand is 170 MW. It is currently divided among 3 POIs. ( 50 MW at Chelan/RRH, 50 MW at Slatt/Boardman, and 70 MW at the US/Canadian Border.) The POD is Alcoa substation, near Vanalco's facility. Without a notice for change in these points, the demand would have to be used on a nonfirm basis. The value, of course, would be in the discounted price you could achieve for the demand. If you have a high load factor usage, it may be very economical. Vanalco would consider offers consistent with the secondary transmission market, subject to the process they are going through in the courts, but their objective is to preserve the asset for the future. The term of the contract begins Oct 1, 2001 and terminates Sept 30, 2002 (1 year), but rollover rights exist which have some value. They would expect some recall rights in the event of production at the smelter, but the notice period could be a number of months. Let me know what you think. If you are not interested, do you know of a party who might either buy or manage this contract? Thanks, Bob
|