|
|
Enron Mail |
Goal:
Lower Not greater than average increase to C&I large Later Surcharge delayed Flatter RTP better Higher Winter Charges better Sustainable More allocation to winter better PGE: Residential Baseline subsidy covered by Residential Positive CARE subsidy covered by all Negative but expected 37.50 (vs 30) since June 1 is start date Positive since later is better $30/MWh allocated on kWh Acceptable since reduces impact to large from CPUC design Use $250/MWh on peak 1st then residual to other hours Negative since results in high summer low winter replace PX with actual charges Negative and contrary to law $10/MWh and $30/MWh should apply to DA Negative to new customers, Positive to USCS case SCE: Recover $30/MWH in proportion to generation revenue Positive CARE allocated to all based on generation revenue Negative but expected Non TOU - $10/MWh increase in 1st block, remainder in 2nd block Indifferent TOU - Delta $10/MWh off, Delta $30/MWH partial, remainder on Negative since high summer Surcharge of $20/MWh in June to Aug to recover lost 2 months Further negative since high summer TURN: End of 10% decrease to res - unlawful Negative Res subsidy should be allocated to all Negative CARE subsidy to all Negative but expected Non TOU - All 1st tier same, Delta $30 in 2nd tier Indifferent TOU - Greater summer vs Winter: On = 200/MWh Negative CLECA: Preferred is an allocation of the Surcharge by top 100 hours Positive re Class, Negative re Seasonal Rates No increase to CARE Negative but expected Non TOU - 1st tier lower average, 2nd tier much higher cust basis Complicated Residential should pay 1st $10/MWh Positive No increase for off peak Negative Partial be made at lease $40/MWh Negative Summer On Peak is residual Negative CEC Voluntary RTP rates with minimum term 6 months Positive Recognize that RTP cannot be done by June 1 Negative ISO must publish imbalance charge daily Negative and not necessary California League of Food Processors Allow customers to select their own 3 hour on peak periods Indifferent unless this results in lower class contributions to $30/MWh surcharge Customers cannot respond to high peak rates Wrong Support Gov. 5%/15% increases for non TOU/TOU Negative since losses will be picked up by others Alliance for Retail Energy Markets DA customers should not be subject to surcharges Positive to new customers, Negative to USCU case Kinder Morgan (Pipeline and Storage Co) Support Gov. proposition that all classes get 30% increase Positive KM supports $320/MWh summer on peak rates provided that Negative KM supports reducing the on peak demand rates Positive if relative to 2 being accepted Question: Do we rescind our testimony? Factors leaning against recincion: CEC advocacy of RTP is weak CLECA, PGE, SCE, TURN advocate higher summer Factors supporting recision: CLECA, PGE, SCE would not allocate above average to C&I PGE, SCE, CLECA would make residential pick up residential subsidy Other: Need to take on PGE Px should not be at market Need to take on PGE Surcharge should be with DA customers??????? We prefer PGE method of recovering 2 month shortfall (allocate over 12 months) vs SCE (allocate over upcoming winter)
|