Enron Mail

From:dave.perrino@enron.com
To:alan.comnes@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com
Subject:CAISO MCP Postings
Cc:ray.alvarez@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, chris.foster@enron.com,chris.mallory@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, bill.iii@enron.com, steve.walton@enron.com
Bcc:ray.alvarez@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, chris.foster@enron.com,chris.mallory@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, bill.iii@enron.com, steve.walton@enron.com
Date:Wed, 6 Jun 2001 05:24:00 -0700 (PDT)

To All,

As per todays (6/6/01) conversation with Keoni Almeida (Enron's customer rep
at the CAISO) the CAISO has been directed by their board to post only the
Market Clearing prices. What this means is the following:

During "Normal" operating periods the Market Clearing Price may be the true
cost of energy in the ISO. The component that could be missing is the cost
and volume of the Out Of Market calls, if any - but there's no way to know,
since this information is not posted.

During any Stage 1-3 market mitigation procedures, the Market Clearing Price
is the highest Proxy Price of the least efficient unit selected under the
mitigation procedures. The ISO is setting the emission credit value to zero
and the proxy has never included gas transportation costs, the proxy MCP is
not really a measure of marginal cost. Further the proxy MCP excludes the
cost and volumes of the Out Of Market calls and any accepted "pay-as-bid"
costs and volumes.

To find the MCP (Proxy Price during Stage 1-3) the following link
http://www.caiso.com/marketops/OASIS/pubmkt2.html button number 17.

The impacts of the lack of this information include, but are not limited to,
our knowing what the real-time cost of going short as a scheduling
coordinator would be or the actual cost of congestion. Not having access to
the complete pricing picture hampers the ability of the real-time traders in
the west from making the best business decisions possible.

Since it has been articulated by Kenoi that the CAISO Board has made a
conscious decision not to post a complete picture of the costs of energy from
hour to hour it would seem that it would be appropriate for Enron to consider
making an attempt to persuade the ISO to reconsider it's decision and that it
would be of significant benefit to the market and the ISO to publish all
pertinent pricing data.

Do you agree? If yes, how do we proceed? If no, why not?

Thanks,

Dave