|
|
Enron Mail |
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Jennifer Rudolph X-To: CA Team X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf * from Govt Affairs * DA customers are exempt from both plans ---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES on 05/10/2001 05:59 PM --------------------------- Susan J Mara@ENRON 05/10/2001 04:23 PM Apologies to those who already got this from Harry. Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854 ----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001 02:20 PM ----- Harry Kingerski 05/10/2001 12:31 PM CORRECTION - last line, Monday, May 14 Harry Kingerski 05/10/2001 01:16 PM 2 proposed decisions were released last night by the California PUC - one by the Judge and one by Chairman Lynch. Direct access customers are exempt from the surcharge. Each customer class is allocated an equal 3 cents, plus an amount to cover the shortfall from having residential usage up to 130% of baseline exempt from the surcharge (as required by law). Each decision allocates a substantial portion of the subsidy to non-residential classes, although Lynch does this to a lesser extent The new rates become effective June 1, and the shortfall from the actual effective date of the increase, March 27, through June 1 will be amortized over 12 months. Residential rate design - 5 tiers will be put in place; the 5th tier (300+% of baseline) gets a 35 cent per kwh rate Non-residential rate design - recommendations to put all of the increase into summer on-peak were rejected. About 60% of increase put into summer. Real Time Pricing was endorsed - will further explore in workshops starting later in May. Voluntary program will be started. In a vindictive outlash, Lynch decision requires federal facilities to pay market prices under new schedules to be developed by the utilities Judge's decision seems to require surcharge to show up as a separate line item; Lynch's decision requires that it not be shown separately Oral argument occurs Friday and final decision is expected to be voted out Monday, June 14.
|