Enron Mail

From:neil.stein@csfb.com
To:
Subject:CSFB Independent Power Weekly; Time to Focus on Valuation!
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 4 Jun 2001 01:29:00 -0700 (PDT)

Good Morning,

Attached, please find the latest issue of our Independent Power Weekly.

<<IPW060401.doc<<

Summary:
1. IPPs Fall 4.0% Last week our IPP composite fell 4.0%, underperforming
both the NASDAQ (+2.4%) and the S&P 500 (-1.1%). Reflecting strong first
quarter earnings results, International Power was the best performer in the
group, rising 3.4%. Calpine was the weakest performer, declining 10.3%.

2. New Issuance, Soft Power Prices and Political Questions Dampen Price
Performance In our view, the group's recent lackluster stock price
performance reflects the following: 1) Pressure Resulting from Equity New
Issuance Activity; 2) Concern Over "Soft" Spot and Forward Power Prices;
and, 3) Lingering Uncertainty Surrounding the Power Shift in the US Senate.

3. Outlook Unchanged; Time to Focus on Valuation! Despite the various
political and power market concerns, we believe the fundamental investment
outlook for the group remains strong. While fixating on the various
political and power market concerns, we believe the market has not focused
enough on increasingly attractive current valuations. We believe the
uncertainties surrounding re-regulation and political backlash are already
embedded in the stock prices. While the pure play US IPP share prices have
increased 3.1% on average, our 2001 and 2002 EPS estimates have increased
nearly 25% and 24%. Consequently, over the period the average P/E multiple
has declined by 17% and 20%, based on 2001 and 2002 EPS, respectively.
4. Embedded Expectations are Low We draw 2 conclusions from the above
data: 1. Stock prices reflect normalized power market conditions 2.
Re-regulation and backlash uncertainty are already reflected in stock
prices.
5. WSJ Article Questions CPN's Lack of Reserves On June 1, 2001, an
article appeared in the Wall Street Journal highlighting the fact that CPN
has not taken reserves against nearly $267 million of receivables from PG&E.
In our view, CPN's rationale for not reserving against its PG&E receivables
is valid. Versus the other major IPPs, CPN's PG&E exposure is unique in
that all of its current receivables have resulted from direct power sales to
PG&E under long-term contracts. Regardless, it is important to put this
issue into perspective. Even assuming a worst case scenario under which CPN
is unable to recover any of its PG&E receivables (highly unlikely), the
investment merits of the CPN story would be unaffected. Failure to recover
would have no impact on CPN's future earnings power or growth rate.

Regards,

Neil Stein 212/325-4217
Bryan Sifert 212/325-3906



This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.




- IPW060401.doc