|
|
Enron Mail |
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/24/2001 05:19 PM -----
Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate 04/24/2001 08:47 AM To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, mday@gmssr.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES Subject: FW: DA Account Balances As you can see from below, I don't see how we can support the PE Advice Letter. We reserved our right to oppose it in the stip. I think we should clarify that SCE will acknowledge our full claim ($124 million) without any offset in exchange for our cooperation with the MOU. -----Original Message----- From: Megan.Scott-Kakures@sce.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Megan+2EScott-Kakures+40sce+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 2:52 PM To: Williams, Robert C. Cc: Jennifer.Tsao@sce.com Subject: DA Account Balances Attached is our record of credit balances for Enron DA accounts, as of April 20. The $84 million or so I referenced this morning is our calculation of what SCE owed through 1/18. If the PE credit methodology is approved and applied back to January 19, then Enron would be rebilled for $68 million (for transmission and distribution charges), which offset against the earlier credit and the credit calculated for 1/19 - 4/20, reduces the total credit owed to $62 million. As we discussed, Jenny is more familiar than I with the details of the credits and will call you back with someone from our Billing/Credit group who is even more familiar. (See attached file: Enron PX Credits as of 4-20-01.xls) - Enron PX Credits as of 4-20-01.xls
|