Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:james.steffes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com
Subject:Fwd: Murkowski Challenges Capitalists To Cap Runaway Power Prices
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 7 May 2001 11:45:00 -0700 (PDT)

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jeff Dasovich
X-To: James D Steffes, Richard Shapiro
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

This is real helpful.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/07/2001 06:44 PM -----

"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com<
05/07/2001 12:16 PM

To: <mmilner@coral-energy.com<, <rreilley@coral-energy.com<,
<ray.alvarez@ei.enron.com<, <acomnes@enron.com<, <cyoder@enron.com<,
<dfulton@enron.com<, <jdasovic@enron.com<, <jsteffe@enron.com<,
<linda.robertson@enron.com<, <rshapiro@enron.com<, <smara@enron.com<,
<snovose@enron.com<, <steve.c.hall@enron.com<, <gackerman@wptf.org<
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Murkowski Challenges Capitalists To Cap Runaway Power Prices
In CA


----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com< on Mon, 07 May
2001 10:49:32 -0500 -----
To: "Justin Long" <jlong@bracepatt.com<
cc: "Aryeh Fishman" <afishman@bracepatt.com<, "Andrea Settanni"
<asettanni@bracepatt.com<, "Charles Ingebretson"
<cingebretson@bracepatt.com<, "Charles Shoneman" <cshoneman@bracepatt.com<,
"Deanna King" <dking@bracepatt.com<, "Dan Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com<,
"Gene Godley" <ggodley@bracepatt.com<, "Kimberly Curry"
<kcurry@bracepatt.com<, "Michael Pate" <mpate@bracepatt.com<, "Paul Fox"
<pfox@bracepatt.com<, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com<
Subject: Murkowski Challenges Capitalists To Cap Runaway Power Prices In CA
FYI

Murkowski Challenges Capitalists To Cap Runaway Power Prices In CA

In what some observers believe could be a watershed change in rhetoric,
Senate energy policy leader Frank Murkowski (R-AK) is berating the capital
community for not coming forward and detailing what kind of ceiling on
wholesale power prices it would take to insure adequate generation -- but
head off continued economic damage to the state of California.

The criticism signals that the chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural
Resources Committee has grown impatient with the hail of philosophical
charges and counter-charges that have followed FERC's April 26 order on the
California market and is turning elsewhere than FERC for a solution. Sources
also say it may be a signal that there is a majority on his committee that
would support some kind of legislative control on the wholesale power market
in the West.

"I am issuing an admonition to the financial community," Murkowski said at
the conclusion of a hearing on the recent FERC order. "If the financial
community will come in and say what terms and conditions they will need to
bring new generation into the state, we can cut through this chatter."

Among other provisions, the FERC order institutes a plan for price controls
during Stage 1 and higher power emergencies. Lawmakers at the hearing,
especially from California and the West, criticized the action as
insufficient to prevent price gouging.

FERC Chairman Curt Hebert said the limited nature of the price controls will
continue to provide the power industry with incentives to build power plants
in California.

Murkowski called on financial interests attending the hearing to settle the
debate.

"Tells us what you will or will not do under a price cap," said Murkowski.

Murkowski indicated that the answer to his question should come directly from
top figures in the financial community.

Murkowski also signaled that Congress may step in and take legislative action
on the California crisis.

"We have to question the adequacy of the order and introduce legislation to
address problems if necessary," Murkowski said.

The sentiment was echoed by other members of the Committee.

"We cannot allow our government to sit idly by and allow a tragically flawed
and easily manipulated power market wreak havoc on our economy," Sen. Maria
Cantwell told Hebert. "If you're not going to take action, Congress is going
to act."

All three FERC commissioners testified at the hearing but it was Chairman
Curt Hebert who was on the receiving end of most of the criticism.

"FERC has done a wonderful imitation of a potted plant," Sen. Byron Dorgan
(D-ND) told Hebert. "Regulation is not a four letter word. The market system
sometimes gets out of wack.

Commissioner William Massey also criticized FERC's order, and acted as
counterpoint to Hebert throughout the hearing. Commissioner Linda Breathitt
defended her support of the April 26 order.

"One thing is clear, you all don't get along very well," observed Dorgan.

"I'm amazed at what's been done," said Murkowski in defending FERC's action
over the past several weeks. "It's better than nothing."

"I've been disappointed," replied Dorgan. "I hope FERC decides it's a
regulatory body and steps up and takes some action."

Sen. Feinstein suggested to Hebert that FERC take a closer look at the impact
of skyrocketing natural gas prices on the exorbitant increase in electricity
prices in California.

In response, Hebert announced that FERC was holding a technical conference
May 24 on current and projected natural gas pipelines into California.

"I agree that this is a natural gas situation and we intend to look into this
as well," Hebert said.


Source: EnergyWashington.com
Date: May 4, 2001
, Inside Washington Publishers