|
|
Enron Mail |
Jeanne,
The on and off peak prices are in the ISO document I attached earlier. Go to page 3 and column 5 "Effective Real-time Average Price" There is an on-peak and off-peak price there. That should make the case that the off-peak price is also high. /TJ ---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES on 04/17/2001 09:58 AM --------------------------- Tamara Johnson 04/17/2001 09:38 AM To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com< @ ENRON cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES Subject: MORE backup for the $290/MWh Harry, The future prices used below are from NYMEX - quoted for California Oregon Border (COB) I am attaching the web pages that are relevant We obtained the NP15 numbers from a daily compilation of Dow Jones NP15 quotes. Since we don't have that on a recognizable piece of paper, I am attaching the most recent ISO Market Activity Report for February. That contains a February price of $341/MWh (see page 3). To get from $290 to (about) $300/MWh add the following 1) Ancillary services -- use about 4-5% of energy costs (see page 5 of ISO report) 2) Losses to get from Supplier to Customer -- even 5% losses (which is conservative) adds another $10/MWh /TJ ---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES on 04/17/2001 09:29 AM --------------------------- Tamara Johnson 04/13/2001 05:22 PM To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: backup for the $290/MWh NP15: Recorded hourly Dow Jones numbers averaged using the same time periods as NYMEX. MW: Reported as of April 12 NYMEX. Peak Periods = (365 days less 10 holidays) x 6/7 weekdays x 16 hours =< 56% On-peak The current rates for PG&E and SCE are as per the Mar 27 CPUC decision. The GWh are from the utilities 2001 (12mos) rate design templates.
|