![]() |
Enron Mail |
I am resending the same file as before (although to a larger group) and need
to make a correction regarding one assumption. I am told the analysis does not yet include the gas indexed contracts. We're working on getting them included and when they are, the overmarket value will likely increase. -----Original Message----- From: Comnes, Alan Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:04 PM To: Dasovich, Jeff; Thome, Jennifer; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James; Mara, Susan; Perrino, Dave; Sharma, Ban; Belden, Tim; Alvarez, Ray Subject: DWR Stranded Cost Update Using information pulled together by Jennifer and BAN, I requested West Tradings Risk/Structuring Group do a more careful analysis of the above-market costs associated with the DWR contracts. Attached is their analysis. In this analysis we examined only the executed contracts and NOT the agreements-in principle. (Only executed contracts were released by the state in the last few weeks.) Also, gas-indexed contracts were examined on their nongas costs only. Since gas costs are a pass through on some contracts, we excluded them as a conservatism; i.e., we did not ascribe costs to the gas portion of the contracts since they will float with market costs over time. These contracts were marked to market using current, applicable curves. Finally we discounted at the LIBOR rate, which is around 4%/year. The stranded cost under these assumptions is approximately $10 billion. The spreadsheet shows the overmarket costs by contract. Note: a negative "mark-to-market" equals a positive stranded cost. As before, this analysis is based upon Enron's confidential forward curves. Approval from Tim Belden is needed before this analysis can be released. Alan Comnes << File: Stranded Cost Analysis Structuring Confidential.xls <<
|