We are using the PUC figures for load. We do not have the load (by size) in
the MOU, it is only in the CPUC figures.

It is the PGE RG-QF estimate that is in question. We have used the MOU
net numbers (93mln x 58%), which are close to our internal figures and
sources which Robert has. It appears that the MOU may have used the proper
RG-QF gen figures but used the wrong divisor in calculating the pie charts.
We can only guess at this based on the other data points we have. I have a
call into Saybrook Capital.



-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 2:53 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Cc: Soo, Jeffrey A.; Neustaedter, Robert
Subject: Re: Trying agin

Michael: did we decide to use the PUC's load numbers? I would worry about
that (particularly since we use the MOU QF/IOU gen numbers). I suggest that
we use the MOU load numbers for the three utilities, since the PUC numbers
seem real screwy e.g., they have PG&E's load being smaller than Edison.

Best,
Jeff