Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:joseph.alamo@enron.com
Subject:Re: Availability for Conference call
Cc:bhansen@lhom.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, sgovenar@govadv.com
Bcc:bhansen@lhom.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, sgovenar@govadv.com
Date:Fri, 1 Jun 2001 06:44:00 -0700 (PDT)

12:30 works for me. 2-330 does not.



Joseph Alamo
06/01/2001 01:32 PM

To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, bhansen@lhom.com
cc: sgovenar@govadv.com
Subject: Re: Availability for Conference call


Since Scott is not available at 1:30... he indicated to me that 12:30 -or-
between 2 - 3:30 would work for him...
how about you folks?
Pls advise,
Thanks
Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 06/01/2001 11:29
AM ---------------------------


Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com< on 06/01/2001 11:18:17 AM
To: Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com
cc: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, bhansen@lhom.com, Paul.Kaufman@enron.com,
Joseph.Alamo@enron.com

Subject: Re:

I can't do it. I have a 1:00 p.m. appointment out of the office and I won't
be
reachable until 2:00 p.m. I must leave the office at 3:45 p.m.

Scott

Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com wrote:

< would l:30 work for a conference call regarding Jeff's meetings in Sacto
< next week? That is best for Bev, as she is traveling....it is going to be
< very difficult to schedule meetings with legislators as next week is
< deadline week for bills to leave the floor and they will be in session
< pretty much full time..it will be possible to try to arrange something with
< staff...Joseph, could you get a call in number, and let Heather know what
< it is..thanks