Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:lee.huber@enron.com
Subject:Re: CPUC
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 6 Jun 2001 05:45:00 -0700 (PDT)

Lee:
Check the PUC website for information---it sounds like the PUC's inquiry into
the adequacy of SoCal's insfrastructure, i.e., in state transportation.
Should be a lot about it on their website (www.cpuc.ca.gov). If you come up
empty, leave me a voicemail (415.782.7822) and I'll track things down.

Best,
Jeff



Lee Huber
06/06/2001 11:11 AM

To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: CPUC

All I know is as follows On March 27,2001 the Commission issued a scoping
memo in 00-11-002. The scoping memo added the issue of the adequacy of
SoCal's transmission system to the issues to be addressed in this proceeding.

An ALJ ruling dated April 26,2001, provided that the adequacy of SoCal's gas
transmission system and the effect on its customers be bifurcated from the
other issues in this proceeding. The ALJ's ruling provided that any party
filing testimony on March 23,2001 would be allowed to file supplemental
testimony on the SoCal capacity issue.

SoCal filed supplemental testimony.

We are not a party. We need to know if it is too late to become a party, if
we wanted to. Also was any other supplemental testimony filed by other
parties??