|
|
Enron Mail |
I appreciate the efforts, but I have questions about whether Enron's presence
does more harm than it does good. I don't think that we want to give Wood and/or Brown a soap box to stand on by showing our face there. Others may have a different view of it, but I think that it needs to be consumers, consumers, consumers. Thoughts? Best, Jeff Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com< 06/28/2001 04:51 PM To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com<, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com<, Bev Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com<, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com<, Susan J Mara <smara@enron.com<, Paul Kaufman <paul.kaufman@enron.com<, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com<, Rick Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com<, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com<, Alan Comnes <acomnes@enron.com<, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com<, Karen Denne <kdenne@enron.com<, "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com<, Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com<, Robert Frank <rfrank@enron.com<, Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com<, Janel Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com<, Miyung Buster <Miyung.Buster@enron.com<, Jennifer Thome <Jennifer.Thome@enron.com<, Eric Letke <eletke@enron.com<, Mary Schoen <Mary.Schoen@enron.com<, David Leboe <David.Leboe@ENRON.com<, Ban Sharma <ban.sharma@enron.com< cc: Subject: Customers The California Chamber of Commerce received a call from someone at the CPUC who requested that they send as many customers as possible to testify at Tuesday's hearing in favor of direct access. The Chamber has requested the same thing of Enron.
|