![]() |
Enron Mail |
Chairman Hebert's response to CPUC White Paper- see attached.
Docket RP00-241-000 From: Christi L Nicolay @ ECT 06/25/2001 09:44 AM To: Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: FERC response to CPUC paper And include Jennifer Thome too. Thanks. ---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 06/25/2001 09:44 AM --------------------------- Christi L Nicolay 06/25/2001 09:27 AM To: Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: FERC response to CPUC paper Linda -- Also include Leslie and Becky. Thanks. From: Christi L Nicolay 06/25/2001 09:26 AM To: Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: FERC response to CPUC paper FYI. .????? FERC Responds to California Energy Commissioner's White Paper on Natural Gas Infrastructure Issues. Chairman Hebert responded to the May 17, 2001 letter from California Energy Commission Michal Moore who invited Hebert to comment on a draft staff white paper on natural gas infrastructure issues by the CEC Electricity and Natural Gas Committee. Hebert expressed agreement with the white paper's general conclusion the natural gas system in California is strained in meeting growing demand. Hebert is encouraged that the report recommends, "supporting intrastate system expansions and exploring the role that enhanced storage can play in meeting future demand." Comments and recommendations from FERC Staff attached to Hebert's letter include expanding the discussion on the need for slack pipeline capacity to achieve price stability, detailing possible options for shippers to avoid interruption, and an examination of possible anti-competitive provisions in intrastate tariffs. ? LINDA L. -- Can you email Herbert's response to this group? Thanks.
|