![]() |
Enron Mail |
Scott, etal --
My final concern. Is anyone at EES concerned with this outcome -- (1) Accept EES' tiering but use 60% of current usage as baseline, (2) all above 60% is DJ Index, and (3) demand below 60% is paid at $500/Mwh (or the ISO price)? This is an adaption of our proposal. Would this be painful? My big fear is that somehow the CPUC uses our filing against us. We need to make sure that these discussions don't get away from us to allow that outcome. Jim Scott Stoness@EES 04/13/2001 12:00 PM To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, jbennett@gmssr.com@ENRON, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Meeting 8AM Central Monday We have agreed on a strategy, subject to Whaley/Delaney approval, to: Scott Stoness submit testimony today advocating 2 part real time pricing in CA Read other parties testimony this weekend from the perspective "Has somebody filed testimony close enough to Stoness testimony, that we can cross examine and brief to a favorable outcome?" Meet on Monday at 8AM to decide whether to rescind Stoness's testimony. The following dial in number and code corresponds to the Monday 8AM Central Time meeting. 1 800 713 8600 68266 is PIN Scott Stoness is host Action Items: All on To list above read and have opinion on 2 and 3 above All on To list above meet on Monday at 8AM. Meet in Stoness office if possible. Harry and Jeane polish Stoness testimony and wait to the last minute before submitting it Jeane ensure all on this To list get a copy of testimony, emailed as soon as she gets it. Scott Stoness
|