Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:eric.thode@enron.com
Subject:Re: Response Statement to PG&E's Ch. 11 Filing
Cc:elizabeth.ivers@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com,mark.koenig@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, meredith.philipp@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, paula.rieker@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, rick.buy@enron.com, sa
Bcc:elizabeth.ivers@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com,mark.koenig@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, meredith.philipp@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, paula.rieker@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, rick.buy@enron.com, sa
Date:Fri, 6 Apr 2001 06:50:00 -0700 (PDT)

FYI, I've faxed PG&E's filing to Rick Shapiro. If others don't have it and
want it, let me know and I'll fax it. The filing's brief--about 10
pages--with more detail apparently to be filed. It lists the top 20
creditors. The only ENE listing in the filing is ENE Canada at $28M.

The other thing that Governor and his PUC could have done many months ago was
realign rates to more accurately reflect the real cost of power. That
arguably was a key determinant driving PG&E to Bankruptcy.

Jeff



Eric Thode
04/06/2001 01:37 PM

To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Vance
Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth
Ivers/NA/Enron@Enron, Rick Buy/Enron@EnronXGate, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Response Statement to PG&E's Ch. 11 Filing

I have returned a call to Gary Gentile from the AP. I gave him this
statement and refused further comments on other issues, which included 1)
"what is Enron's actual exposure?", 2) "what was Enron's opinion of Gov.
Davis' speech last night?", and 3) "was this PG&E's only option?" I did
respond to one follow-up question, which was "what options were available
months ago?" My answer included the following 1) demand side solutions, 2)
allowing long-term contracting for power supplies, and 3) expediting the
siting process for new supplies.

Eric





Karen Denne
04/06/2001 01:17 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Vance
Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula
Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Ivers/NA/Enron@Enron, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT,
Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Response Statement to PG&E's Ch. 11 Filing

It's unfortunate that the state's largest utility was forced to turn to the
courts for a resolution. Solutions to the state's energy crisis have been
available for months that would have avoided this scenario, but Gov. Davis
and the Legislature lacked the bold leadership to take swift, decisive
action.

Enron's exposure to PG&E will not have any material effect on earnings or on
our financial condition.

If pressed: Any further comment would be speculative, as we have not yet
seen the filing.