![]() |
Enron Mail |
Cc: tamara.johnson@enron.com, scott.stoness@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com,
robert.neustaedter@enron.com, jbennett@gmssr.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: tamara.johnson@enron.com, scott.stoness@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, robert.neustaedter@enron.com, jbennett@gmssr.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com X-From: James D Steffes X-To: Susan J Mara X-cc: Tamara Johnson, Scott Stoness, Harry Kingerski, Robert Neustaedter, jbennett@gmssr.com, Jeff Dasovich, Sandra McCubbin X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf We care a great deal on Point #2 - the PX Credit issue. Harry Kingerski will have the right messages. Jim Susan J Mara 05/11/2001 12:28 PM To: Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, jbennett@gmssr.com, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: SCE Plans to Implement billing and balancing account aspects of MOU as of June 3 I learned at the AReM meeting today: SCE has informed ESPs that it will implement its advice letter on the MOU (don't recall the number) beginning with the new rates on June 3. We are planning to protest that AL. Do we care? IF we do, Jeanne, can we stop them? Also, SCE has informed people that it is calculating the PX Charge/Credit based on its AL that was rejected by the CPUC. Do we care on that one? Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854
|