RE: Trying agin

We are using the PUC figures for load. We do not have the load (by size) in
the MOU, it is only in the CPUC figures.

It is the PGE RG-QF estimate that is in question. We have used the MOU
net numbers (93mln x 58%), which are close to our internal figures and
sources which Robert has. It appears that the MOU may have used the proper
RG-QF gen figures but used the wrong divisor in calculating the pie charts.
We can only guess at this based on the other data points we have. I have a
call into Saybrook Capital.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 2:53 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Cc: Soo, Jeffrey A.; Neustaedter, Robert
Subject: Re: Trying agin

Michael: did we decide to use the PUC's load numbers? I would worry about
that (particularly since we use the MOU QF/IOU gen numbers). I suggest that
we use the MOU load numbers for the three utilities, since the PUC numbers
seem real screwy e.g., they have PG&E's load being smaller than Edison.

Best,
Jeff