![]() |
Enron Mail |
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: "n.etkin" <n.etkin@verizon.net< X-To: <counihan@greenmountain.com<, <jdasovic@enron.com< X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf Dear Rick and Jeff: I'm the Project Director for the CAEM RED Index and Ken Malloy suggested I send this request to you. We have contacted the CPUC for their response to our survey update, but their press of business results in no response from them to us. The dramatic changes in California from December 2000 to June 2001 makes it imperative that we have some intelligence on updating the individual attributes. Based on the attached PDF file description of the attributes and the Word document table of characterizations which shows year end 2000 and a blank for May 2001, could you help me by filling in those blanks based on your knowledge of state legislation, CPUC orders or anything else official that has changed the way they implement their electric restructuring plan? I don't expect an answer to the seven survey questions, but feel free to provide your response just for my education. I've sent this request to Commissioner Bilas, who works with Ken, but he couldn't offer any assistance, so I'm relying on the industry to fill in the blanks. If you have any other suggestions of who might be able to respond to this information, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your help. Nancy Etkin RED Index Project Director Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets E-mail netkin@caem.org Voice (703) 532-6887 Fax (208) 361-0785 - Attributes for 2001 RED Index1.PDF - California survey response.doc
|